At the conceptual level, individual differences in WMC have two main sources. In that way, WMC–operationalized as the number of to-be-remembered items recalled in correct serial order–is measured in conditions of interference caused by the second, processing component of the task. individual letters), which comprise the memory component of the tasks, participants are engaged in processing portion of the tasks (e.g. In span tasks, in between presentations of the individual to-be-remembered items (e.g. This twofold nature of the WMC is reflected in the structure of WM span tasks (span tasks). The second function is a strategic search of secondary memory, which reflects the capability to retrieve relevant information from longer-term storage, in the presence of competitive, irrelevant information. one’s capability to direct attention within the domain of primary memory in order to maintain relevant information in a highly activated state in the presence of interferences. The first function is executive attention, i.e. Within the dual-component model, working memory capacity (WMC) is defined by two controlled functions of the central executive that surface in the conditions of interference. Thus, it is recommended that researchers discard this accuracy criterion as a criterion for filtering the results for further statistical analyses.īy developing further the concept of the central executive from Baddeley and Hitch’s working memory (WM) model, Engle and colleagues proposed a dual-component model of working memory capacity (for an overview, see: ). Omitting the 85% accuracy criterion on the processing component of the span tasks did not impair their psychometric properties. Furthermore, all tasks have satisfactory convergent construct validity as well as criterion validity estimated in relation to measures of fluid intelligence. 70 the exception being all types of the symmetry span task absolute scores with α values close to. All the tasks had an adequate internal consistency with Cronbach’s αs equal to or above. The study demonstrates that the group administration of span tasks does not compromise their psychometric characteristics. Metric characteristics of all measures were compared across two parallel analyses: with and without application of a typical 85% accuracy criterion on the processing component of the tasks. ![]() For each task, the metric characteristics of six scoring procedures were evaluated: partial, absolute, partial non-weighted, absolute non-weighted, partial weighted, and absolute weighted scoring. The study examined the psychometric characteristics of three automated working memory span tasks: operational, reading, and symmetry span task, administered in groups of participants.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |